Looking back over the many seasons of success in huskerland, all the great seasons had one or two games where luck played a huge role. In '93 we played for a national championship because KU went for two and failed. In 97 there was that "nice catch" by Matt Davison. Later that year, there was a key turnover when Tennessee was driving in the first half of the Orange bowl that turned a game from a close win and likely no championship into a rout.
So, last year did we get to 9-4 and a nice bowl via some luck? Hmmm.... the number 57 comes to mind.
I am quick to remind the overwhelming optimists about 2009 that our signature win was over KU, then Clemson and then.... KSU? CU? Our third biggest win was against a team that did not go to a bowl. That is not a good sign of how we play when our strength of schedule gets factored in.
People will point out that we had "bad" luck against Texas Tech - all we had to do was not turn it over and we beat them. Yes, we would have beat them because they missed their PAT. Now that is luck in our favor and we just returned the favor.
So, how much luck will we need this year -- will luck beat OU or V-tech? Probably not, since we returned a punt for a TD in LIncoln last year against Tech and couldn't win, luck is not enough out there.
I think luck helps us beat Texas Tech this year, they like to be generous and we like to give it back - remember LeKevin Smith's interception return/fumble?
Some say it is better to be lucky than good - are we good enough yet to generate our own luck?